Showing posts with label andea rossi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label andea rossi. Show all posts
Hey Pseudosceptics - Does THIS Sound Familiar?
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Here's an article by Michael Prescott that you'll all recognise yourselves in.
"Now, as has been frequently pointed out, this use of the term "skeptic" is more than a little misleading. In common usage, a skeptic is someone who maintains an open mind, insisting on evidence for any claim. The more unusual the claim, the more stringent the evidential demands. According to this view, the skeptic has no private agenda, no personal bias, but serves only as a guardian of the truth, who weeds out unsupported allegations and superstitious imaginings. The skeptic is the proverbial Missourian; though willing to be convinced, he says, "Show me."
That's the theory. In practice, things are different. Far from being a state of habitual open-mindedness, today's skepticism is characterized by resistance to any new ideas or new evidence, and unwillingness to critically examine its own biases. These tendencies, in turn, rest on a very definite agenda, promoted by a clear and comprehensive worldview..."
http://michaelprescott.freeservers.com/skeptic.htm
BINGO! Michael. "resistance to any new ideas or new evidence, and unwillingness to critically examine its own biases" Thta's it! That's THE line, right there. Nailed it Michael. Nailed it perfectly. Tell em what he's won Johnny!
and again here "These tendencies, in turn, rest on a very definite agenda". Oh yeah, that's it right there. Nail on the head.
Prescott identifies them in all but name: "Pseudosceptics" or the now more appropriately named "PseudoscepTICKS".
"They are creatures of comfort and routine, not explorers. They cannot think outside the box. They will, in fact, deny that there is or ever could be anything outside the box - and they'll heap scorn on anyone who suggests otherwise. They'll call names, cry fraud, and holler that civilization is in danger and the barbarians are at the gates. They'll do anything, really - except examine their own assumptions with a remotely critical eye."
Read more...
"Now, as has been frequently pointed out, this use of the term "skeptic" is more than a little misleading. In common usage, a skeptic is someone who maintains an open mind, insisting on evidence for any claim. The more unusual the claim, the more stringent the evidential demands. According to this view, the skeptic has no private agenda, no personal bias, but serves only as a guardian of the truth, who weeds out unsupported allegations and superstitious imaginings. The skeptic is the proverbial Missourian; though willing to be convinced, he says, "Show me."
That's the theory. In practice, things are different. Far from being a state of habitual open-mindedness, today's skepticism is characterized by resistance to any new ideas or new evidence, and unwillingness to critically examine its own biases. These tendencies, in turn, rest on a very definite agenda, promoted by a clear and comprehensive worldview..."
http://michaelprescott.freeservers.com/skeptic.htm
BINGO! Michael. "resistance to any new ideas or new evidence, and unwillingness to critically examine its own biases" Thta's it! That's THE line, right there. Nailed it Michael. Nailed it perfectly. Tell em what he's won Johnny!
and again here "These tendencies, in turn, rest on a very definite agenda". Oh yeah, that's it right there. Nail on the head.
Prescott identifies them in all but name: "Pseudosceptics" or the now more appropriately named "PseudoscepTICKS".
"They are creatures of comfort and routine, not explorers. They cannot think outside the box. They will, in fact, deny that there is or ever could be anything outside the box - and they'll heap scorn on anyone who suggests otherwise. They'll call names, cry fraud, and holler that civilization is in danger and the barbarians are at the gates. They'll do anything, really - except examine their own assumptions with a remotely critical eye."
LENR - Low Energy Negative Reports
Thursday, January 12, 2012
Will Andrea Rossi's eCat prove to be the real thing to take the world by storm or will it be revealed that it was all an elaborate hoax? One person who thinks that Rossi does not have the goods is Steven Krivit, Editor of New Energy Times.
From January 14th when Rossi conducted his first public tests in Bologna until midway through June New Energy Times editor Krivit made a total of 16 posts on Andrea Rossi and his eCat, almost all of them benign scepticism.
Krivit then personally met with Rossi in Bologna, was totally unimpressed with what he saw and then presented his findings in a series of blog reports and that seemed to be the start of the hostilities between the two.
On 17th June Rossi retaliated and called Krivit a "SNAKE" and a "FAKE JOURNALIST" on his blog. Krivit said nothing and remained silent for a couple of days before writing, "I may continue to read some of his interesting messages for a little while longer, but not much longer. Research and interviews are over. The pen now hits the ink."
Since then, at least since June 16th 2011, New Energy Times writer Steven B Krivit had written a total of 41 separate blog posts in condemnation of the ecat and Rossi's credibility, and has also taken aim at the credibility of those who Krivit claims are "promoting" Rossi or his eCat. That works out at approximatelty one post every 4 days.
Krivits 41 Blog Posts Since June 2011 Slamming Rossi's eCat and Pro eCat Commentators
"The report I received on Jan. 17 from Francesco Celani, a physicist with the Instituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare in Frascati, Italy (National Institute of Nuclear Physics), gives me new confidence about the Rossi-Focardi device. If the data provided to Celani is correct and complete, the device is real and is demonstrating some excess heat – on demand, no less."
"Rossi has, to his credit, answered all of my questions."
"As far as Rossi’s story of a self-sustaining reactor, I am inclined to believe it. It is very similar to a story that Piantelli told me."
Read more...
From January 14th when Rossi conducted his first public tests in Bologna until midway through June New Energy Times editor Krivit made a total of 16 posts on Andrea Rossi and his eCat, almost all of them benign scepticism.
Krivit then personally met with Rossi in Bologna, was totally unimpressed with what he saw and then presented his findings in a series of blog reports and that seemed to be the start of the hostilities between the two.
On 17th June Rossi retaliated and called Krivit a "SNAKE" and a "FAKE JOURNALIST" on his blog. Krivit said nothing and remained silent for a couple of days before writing, "I may continue to read some of his interesting messages for a little while longer, but not much longer. Research and interviews are over. The pen now hits the ink."
Since then, at least since June 16th 2011, New Energy Times writer Steven B Krivit had written a total of 41 separate blog posts in condemnation of the ecat and Rossi's credibility, and has also taken aim at the credibility of those who Krivit claims are "promoting" Rossi or his eCat. That works out at approximatelty one post every 4 days.
Krivits 41 Blog Posts Since June 2011 Slamming Rossi's eCat and Pro eCat Commentators
- The Failure of Rossi’s Energy Catalyzer, Caught on Video - 7th January
- The E-Cat Tribe Dec 23rd 2011
- LENR Real; Rossi and Defkalion Dubious - December 20, 2011
- Duncan’s Promotion of Rossi: A Tremendous Disservice - December 9, 2011
- The Physics of Why the E-Cat’s Cold Fusion Claims Collapse - December 7, 2011
- University of Bologna Clarifies Relationship With Rossi - December 1, 2011
- Rossi Story: A Conversation With Thomas Blakeslee - November 28, 2011
- Rossi: Declining Magnitude of Claims - November 27, 2011
- Rossi Story: Corriere di Bologna Gets it Wrong - November 26, 2011
- Rossi Declines Italian and U.S. Government Testing Offers - November 26, 2011
- Ny Teknik Chief Responds to Swedish Public Radio - November 21, 2011
- Swedish Public Radio Turns Spotlight on Lewan and Ny Teknik - November 12, 2011
- Rossi’s Mystery Customer Performs Disappearing Act, Twice - November 12, 2011
- University of Bologna Denies Faculty Involvement with Rossi - November 11, 2011
- NASA Engineer Explains Why Rossi Demos Failed - November 10, 2011
- Rossi Source for Fox and MSNBC: Obama Teleported to Mars - November 10, 2011
- The Big Lie Technique of Scammers, Courtesy of Adolf Hitler - November 10, 2011
- Sterling Allan: Arm-in-Arm with Andrea Rossi - November 10, 2011
- Poor Journalism by Fox News on Rossi Story - November 9, 2011
- Poor Journalism by Physorg on Rossi Story - November 9, 2011
- Poor Journalism by Wired U.K. on Rossi Story - November 9, 2011
- Scientific Critique Against Rossi Claim - November 5, 2011
- Noble Aspirations Are Not Enough - October 30, 2011
- Energy Catalzyer: Extraordinary Scams Require Extraordinary Claims - October 28, 2011
- Rossi’s 11th Test, 11th Failure - October 10, 2011
- E-Cat Test Demonstrates Energy Loss - October 8, 2011
- Wired UK Article on Rossi Today - October 6, 2011
- NASA Won’t Confirm Relationship With Rossi - October 6, 2011
- Rossi: The Scientific Verdict - August 28, 2011
- Physorg Review of New Energy Times Report #3 - August 26, 2011
- Sources that Support the Rossi Claim? - August 26, 2011
- Rossi’s Scientific Failure in Seven Steps - August 7, 2011
- Reviewing Ny Teknik Video: Did Rossi Play With Power Setting? - August 5, 2011
- New Energy Times Publishes Report #3 on Rossi Device - July 31, 2011
- Possible Low or No Levels of Excess Heat in Rossi Device - July 29, 2011
- New Energy Times Report #3 on Rossi Device Coming Soon - July 29, 2011
- Uppsala University Denies Rossi Research Agreement - July 12, 2011
- Report #2 – Energy Catalyzer: Scientific Communication and Ethics Issues - June 28, 2011
- Levi’s Response to “Preliminary Report” - June 19, 2011
- Rossi’s Responses to “Preliminary Report” - June 19, 2011
- Preliminary Report of Interviews with E-Cat Trio Rossi, Focardi and Levi - June 16, 2011
All of this was in stark contrast to Krivit's early 2011 comments on Rossi and his eCat.
On 19th January he wrote:
On 19th January he wrote:
"The report I received on Jan. 17 from Francesco Celani, a physicist with the Instituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare in Frascati, Italy (National Institute of Nuclear Physics), gives me new confidence about the Rossi-Focardi device. If the data provided to Celani is correct and complete, the device is real and is demonstrating some excess heat – on demand, no less."
"Rossi has, to his credit, answered all of my questions."
"As far as Rossi’s story of a self-sustaining reactor, I am inclined to believe it. It is very similar to a story that Piantelli told me."
NY Teknik Update On Defkalion
Friday, December 2, 2011
In an interview with Ny Teknik, Alexandros Xanthoulis, representing the owners of Defkalion, stated that:
- Defkalion started to think of developing its own technology in July 2011
- 12 Hyperion prototypes are now running.
- The factory of 11,000 square meters in Xanthia will be ready in four months.
- The Defkalion lab will be transferred to a 2,500 square meter lab at the Xanthia location in a few weeks.
- 19 license agreements have been made.
- No money has yet been transfered. Interested companies will pay 500,000 Euros in an escrow account before testing a final product. Half of the license fee of 40.5 million Euros should be be paid at delivery of know-how, and the remaining part after ten days of operation of a factory producing Hyperion products.
- 27 scientists work in-house at Defkalion
- A total of 40 people are employed at Defkalion.
Xanthoulis gave no further information on verification of the core technology, except that it will be made by third parties later this year.
Source: NY Teknik
Rossi eCat: Now CBS, and The Daily Mail Report
Saturday, November 5, 2011
Military eCat: Is the US Navy's SPAWAR Rossi's Customer?
Thursday, November 3, 2011
Rossi's first customer who is now the proud owner of their very own 1MW fusion reactor looks almost certainly military in origin, and could well be SPAWAR. Space And Naval Warfare Systems Command. Should we now call it the NavyCat?
All the clues were there:
- The Need For Secrecy Strictly Dictated By The Customer
- The Mysterious Colonel Domenico Fioravanti Who Supervised The Test.
- The Viewing Restrictions Of Maximum Two People At A Time For 5 Minutes Only At The Test
Some clues from Rossi were there also:
Andrea Rossi
October 29th, 2011 at 12:14 PM
Dear Max:
The Customer is of a category that usually maintains secret all they do. I do not know if and when they will want to make public statements and I am bound to a strict non disclosure agreement.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea Rossi
"the person who leaded the test, an engineer of NATO ( a Colonel) who has 30 years of experience in thermopower plants and thermodynamical systems.It is entirely possible that the Navy contracted the supervision of the tests out to a NATO Colonel on behalf of the US Navy. Additionally, it also fits that the customer was not concerned about recieving what is essentially a prototype product for further development.
The US Navy has a long history and association with cold fusion going back to the Pons and Fleischmann era, even studying cold fusion in secret for over a decade while mainstream science shrugged at it's very mention.
From the FOX News article:
Allan hinted on his blog that an unnamed “customer” of Rossi's device is a military organization that starts with an N. Rossi said this customer measured and verified the test -- and told FoxNews.com that Paul Swanson with the U.S. Navy’s Space and Naval Warfare Systems unit (SPAWAR) can vouch for the demonstration.
FoxNews.com spoke with a man at SPAWAR who identified himself as Swanson, and who said only that he was "not in a position to talk to the press." Several other sources within the Navy and the Pentagon either declined to comment or did not return messages.
The US Navy has a long history and association with cold fusion going back to the Pons and Fleischmann era, even studying cold fusion in secret for over a decade while mainstream science shrugged at it's very mention.
From the FOX News article:
FoxNews.com spoke with a man at SPAWAR who identified himself as Swanson, and who said only that he was "not in a position to talk to the press." Several other sources within the Navy and the Pentagon either declined to comment or did not return messages.
Who are SPAWAR?
SPAWAR (pronounced spā-wôr) is one of three major Department of Navy acquisition commands. SPAWAR delivers higher-end Navy information technology products and services to the fleet and other Defense Department stakeholders. As the Navy’s Information Dominance Systems Command, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command designs, develops and deploys advanced communications and information capabilities.
With more than 8,900 active duty military and civil service professionals located around the world and close to the fleet, SPAWAR is at the forefront of research, engineering, acquisition and support services that provide vital decision superiority to our forces at the right time and for the right cost.
It is our mission to make the Navy’s Information Dominance vision a reality.
Our products and services transform ships, aircraft and vehicles from individual platforms into
integrated battle forces, enhancing information dominance and awareness among Navy, Marine, joint forces, federal agencies and international allies. As the Navy’s technical lead for C4ISR, SPAWAR provides the hardware and software to connect our warfighters at sea, on land and in the air.
integrated battle forces, enhancing information dominance and awareness among Navy, Marine, joint forces, federal agencies and international allies. As the Navy’s technical lead for C4ISR, SPAWAR provides the hardware and software to connect our warfighters at sea, on land and in the air.
We support the full lifecycle of product and service delivery: from the initial research and development, to acquisition and deployment, to operations and logistics support.
Source: SPAWAR website
eCat 1MW Test Will Be Private
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
Today we learned that The 1MW eCat Reactor Will Not Be A Public Test Like October 6th Was.
Instead, the test will be carried out privately for a small group of individuals. This group will be made up of consultants and representatives of the as yet unnamed Customer as well as "prominent scientific journalists". The customer will be monitoring the progress and is ultimately interested in the report results on completion of the test.
Andrea Rossi
October 18th, 2011 at 3:18 PM
Dear Sean Parker, Yes, after the 28th no more public tests, we will be too engaged to manufacture and test for our Customers. We will continue R&D work with Bologna University and Uppsala University, but the work will not be public. Actually, also the test of the 28th will not be public, being a test made by the Customer, with his experts, along a contractual protocol. Anyway it will be the last work with a public report made upon the resulting numbers.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Read more...
Instead, the test will be carried out privately for a small group of individuals. This group will be made up of consultants and representatives of the as yet unnamed Customer as well as "prominent scientific journalists". The customer will be monitoring the progress and is ultimately interested in the report results on completion of the test.
Andrea Rossi
October 18th, 2011 at 3:18 PM
Dear Sean Parker, Yes, after the 28th no more public tests, we will be too engaged to manufacture and test for our Customers. We will continue R&D work with Bologna University and Uppsala University, but the work will not be public. Actually, also the test of the 28th will not be public, being a test made by the Customer, with his experts, along a contractual protocol. Anyway it will be the last work with a public report made upon the resulting numbers.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
In response to a question Rossi also tells us that "prominent scientific journalists" will be attending the test. The questioner asks "In other words, will this test be the one that finally makes the E-Cat known to the larger public through mass media reports?" Rossi's reply "Yes".
One immediately thinks of prominent scientific journalists from Nature, New Scientist and all of the other heavyweight mainstream publications, but it remains to be seen if that is what Rossi means by "prominent scientific journalists". Enough time has passed and enough interesting experiments have taken place to rouse even the most dopey journalist out of their iPhone obsessions, so it certainly makes sense that by now most of the big media would have been making enquiries (perhaps behind the scenes). This 28th Oct test is after all, "The BIG One".
The results of the test may not become known publicly for some time after the experiment concludes (perhaps even weeks), but Rossi seems confident that news of the eCat as a new primary energy source will be delivered to the sleeping goggle eyed masses.
Unlike Rossi, I am less confident that the energy industry and it's political apparatus and media partners will bow in submission to the new kid on the block - LENR. Unless of course the transition to these technologies has been designed to happen this way?
Defkalion Respond To Stremmenos: Let's Move Forward With LENR
Thursday, October 13, 2011
Dear Christo,
It was with profound regret that I read your public letter and personal attacks against Defkalion. I was even more surprised by the obvious contradiction with your status as Honorary Vice President and Head of our company’s R&D. In legal terms, this could be considered by ill-wishers as a breach of contract.
Please recall that we have incurred considerable damage in the recent past from inaccurate statements. For example the announcement of alleged rights of Ampenergo, which are contradictory to our contractual rights with EFA. Christo, as you remember, the contract we signed on November 17, 2010 with EFA, clause 1.13 clearly states that our global presence excludes the USA and military applications.
As a key player involved between the contracted parties, you also signed a document relinquishing your impartiality to become a formal member of Defkalion’s BoD with the position of VP of R&D, which was given to you after your personal request for this position and was unanimously agreed by our BoD.
Since June you have unfortunately missed all of BoD meetings and R&D development breakthroughs. Although you and Rossi received, signed and approved our product designs for Version 3, we have made significant progress since then and are now in Version 7, which leads to a full working prototype ready for production.
Your declaration that "we don’t have the technology" is in contradiction to your recent attempts to entice away our scientists which was not concluded successfully.
We stress again that it is a pity that our designs were applied wrongly, demonstrating in public, immature prototypes with wrong protocols and instruments as explained in our communication on Monday, 10th October.
In all such cases, had there been close cooperation with Defkalion to develop the technology together, as opposed to focusing and putting pressure on us to receive money, many of these unfortunate legal and technical misunderstandings could have been avoided.
As such, all these created serious delays for all contractual parties and for payment to be made according to our contract. You will safely recall that payment is based on the successful demonstration according to protocols and procedures that have been supplied to EFA, whose conditions have not been met yet.
Many will agree that this situation is confusion to the point of comic tragic. Defkalion has the science, the know-how and the ability to proceed, the team, the electronics, the engineering, as well as all the funds required to move this project forward; there is no delusion. Yet, there seems to be a strange urgency to avoid the kick-off of this project but instead just to create negative noise. Defkalion respects your position and friendship, as well as Rossi’s creativity and ingenuity. However, patience has its limits and business has its goals. It would be a shame for Defkalion to move forward in LENR either alone or with alternative technologies.
I hope you agree that such a situation of confusion can only create great consternation. However, Defkalion confirms that it has the organization and professional team, plus all necessary infrastructure in order to direct the availability of funds. I sincerely hope that we shall press the start button together.
Alexandros Xanthoulis
Video: Rossi 1MW Fusion Reactor Unveiled
Wednesday, September 14, 2011
Amazing News Today - This is just a quick post to get the news out as fast as possible. Report and Analysis to follow soon. The video was quite slow to load, but this is probably due to the large amount of traffic hitting the NY Teknik site.
Ny Teknik got a look at the plant last week in Bologna, where it had been assembled from parts supposedly manufactured in Rossis’s factory in Miami, Florida.
The plant consists of 52 ‘E-cats’ of a new model that Rossi says he developed this spring, partly through discussions with the Swedish physicists Sven Kullander and Hanno Essen, mainly regarding research done by Hidetsugu Ikegami, a professor emeritus at Osaka University in Japan.
NY Teknik Report
Images courtesy Mats Lewan (NY Teknik)
Now THREE E-Catalyzer Factories To Manufacture Cold Fusion Modules
Monday, May 9, 2011
"We have the final product in our hands, not the experimental one, exactly the one that we are going to produce. It works excellent."
- 3 Cold Fusion Catalyzer Manufacturing Facilities On The Way
- Final Commercial Product Design Of E-Catalyzer Ready To Go
- 200 Million In Investment
- 300,000 Energy Catalyzers Produced Per Year
- Several "Important Countries" already requesting the Ecat modules.
RAI TV News (an Italian TV station) recently featured a lengthy news item on Andrea Rossi and his energy catalyzer invention. Among those interviwed were Swedish scientists Sven Kullander of Upsalla University who is also chairman of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Energy Committee and Hanno Essen (Associate professor of theoretical physics at the Swedish Royal Institute of Technology and chairman of the Swedish Skeptics Society). They recently said of the energy catalyzer:
“Any chemical process should be ruled out for producing 25 kWh from whatever is in a 50 cubic centimeter container. The only alternative explanation is that there is some kind of a nuclear process that gives rise to the measured energy production.”
Defkalion Green Technologies
The news item also featured a fascinating question and answer session with executives Alexandros Xanthoulis and David C. Aurel from Defkalion Green Technologies interviewed by Angelo Saso from RAI TV. The Defkalion factory will be the site of the inaugural October 1MW Energy Catalyzer Plant. The plant to be built in Xanthi, Greece, will be the first ever cold fusion power facility in history to be developed. Defkalion will also have exclusive license to manufacture and sell the energy catalyzer modules.
Here, Defkalion executive Alexandros Xanthoulis indicates that the first plant in Xanthi, Greece will be used as a reference site for other businesses interested in pursuing the ecatalyzer for their energy generation needs.
Alexandros Xanthoulis: "The 1MW facility in Xanthi will however we will also use it as a presentation or showcase for future potential interested parties."
Angelo Saso "Is the Energy Catalyzer ready for the market?"
Alexandros Xanthoulis: "We have the final product in our hands, not the experimental one, exactly the one that we are going to produce. It works excellent."
David C. Aurel: "Actually the device what we are going to sell (or let's say provide) is going to be a 10kW device producing solely heat.
Angelo Saso: "How much will it consume in terms of fuel and money?"
David C. Aurel: "Again speaking about households will have no other charges or costs except for the leasing fee because we will provide all the ingredients for the device."
Angelo Saso: How many devices will you run out?
David C. Aurel: "As many as we can produce. As a rule of thumb we can assume a final full capacity of 300,000 units per year."
The narrator Angelo Sasso then goes on to say that "A factory to commence production and a further 2 on paper." So it would seem that the plant in Greece is just the first of at least THREE energy catalyzer facilities.
The question of who is behind this company comes up and is answered by David C Aurel - "Defkalion is funded by a group of non-governmental entities. It's not just private investors but they are entities also in industry and international. They come from different parts of the world."
Angelo Saso: How much money will be invested in the project?
"Well to cover Greece and Balkans we estimate about 200 million.. I believe it 100%, our investors believe it 100%. and if you see the messages we are getting from all over the world, they believe it 100%. There are several countries (important countries) who are already requesting to buy the product from us.
Watch the full video report in English here:
The Magic Of Mr Rossi: E-Catalyzer Set To Transform Energy Landscape
Saturday, May 7, 2011
No words needed. Just watch the video. Report to follow.
Read more...
Cold Fusion: Devices In 3 Months, Mass Production by End Of 2011
Friday, January 21, 2011
Rossi Shows The Operation Of The Reactor
Last Saturday scientists at the University of Bologna, Italy, led by Andrea Rossi and Sergio Focardi announced that they developed a viable cold fusion process.
The demonstration device is capable of producing 12,400 W of heat power with an input of just 400W. A private invitation only press conference was held and the device was demonstrated to the 50 or so witnesses including scientists from the University of Bologna.
In addition, the scientists say they are already beyond the prototype stage and plan to start shipping units within 3 months with mass production by the end of 2011. Despite much higher ratios of output these first commercial devices would produce around 8 units of output for every 1 unit of input in order to safely and reliably operate.
Rossi also stated that they are working on a 1 megawatt facility comprised of 125 reactor modules.
The cost of the energy produced would be cheaper than 1 cent per kWh which is several orders of magnitude cheaper than any conventional fossil fuel energy sources.
Rossi said: “We have passed already the phase to convince somebody,” he wrote in his forum. “We are arrived to a product that is ready for the market. Our judge is the market. In this field the phase of the competition in the field of theories, hypothesis, conjectures etc etc is over. The competition is in the market. If somebody has a valid technology, he has not to convince people by chattering, he has to make a reactor that work and go to sell it, as we are doing.”
The demonstration was also attended by a representative of Defkalion Energy, based in Athens, who said that the company was interested in a 20 kW unit and that within two months they would make a public announcement.
Giuseppe Levi, a nuclear physicist from INFN (Italian National Institute of Nuclear Physics), helped organize last Friday’s demonstration in Bologna. Levi confirmed that the reactor produced about 12 kW and noted that the energy was not of chemical origin since there was no measurable hydrogen consumption. Levi and other scientists plan to produce a technical report on the design and execution of their evaluation of the reactor.
Meanwhile Focardi And Rossi's paper on the reactor has been rejected by peer-reviewed journals on the basis that they don't have a current theory to explain the results of the reaction.
"Rossi and Focardi have applied for a patent that has also been partially rejected in a preliminary report. According to the report, “As the invention seems, at least at first, to offend against the generally accepted laws of physics and established theories, the disclosure should be detailed enough to prove to a skilled person conversant with mainstream science and technology that the invention is indeed feasible."
So here we have once again deliberate acts of sabotage by establishment science against new energy solutions simply because they threaten scientific dogma and fanatical establishment beliefs.
Rather predictably we also have a deafening silence from the world's controlled corporate media who must be wondering how long they can maintain the silence before critical mass is achieved? (if you pardon the pun).
Time after time we are seeing legitimate attempts to bring new energy technologies thwarted by mainstream fear.
If they can get working devices to market this year then none of the mainstream peer review will matter anyway. As Focardi rightly says "he has not to convince people by chattering, he has to make a reactor that work and go to sell it, as we are doing.”
Purchase enquiries should be directed to mailto: info@leonardocorp1996.com
PESN - Cold Fusion Prepping For Market http://pesn.com/2011/01/17/9501746_Focardi-Rossi_10_kW_cold_fusion_prepping_for_market/
Focardi And Rossi's website - http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
