Scientists Dump Science

On 3rd October, A user named quantumdarkness19 attempted to start a legitimate scientific discussion and investigation into Steorn's eOrbo technology on mainstream scientific forum SciForums.com. He presents an amazing amount of data backed by charts and oscilloscope captures to get some sort of scientific dialogue, feedback and discussion on the matter.

After presenting the data some pseudoskeptics complain bitterly and the moderator moves the thread to "Pseudoscience".

Aptly named user "Blindman" is outraged by the fact the thread is located in a science part of the forum stating "Mods why has this thread not been moved to Pseudoscience where it belongs.."

User "spidergoat" arrogantly spouts "Claims for perpetual motion are always inherently wrong, no further analysis is necessary."

"Finally, the moderator James R replies "If Steorn's engine worked, it would violate the first law of thermodynamics. No more needs to be said. Thread moved to pseudoscience."

No attempt at scientific discussion was made. No attempt to explain the phenomena. No discussion or any attempt at anything vaguely scientific, just sheer pseudoskeptic arrogance that it can't possibly work based on assumption and faith.

Is this how good science is done these days? Is this our modern approach to new science and phenomena? If so, then we are on a downward slop.

Ladies and gentlement, this is a small incident, but is typical of the kind of sickness and deformity that has penetrated and is symptomatic of every part of the pompus pig-headed modern mainstream scientific establishment. We are seeing this kind of thing over and over again on an almost daily basis. Shameful use of ridicule and mocking tactics used to unscientifically discredit without debate.

Anything contrary to scientific dogma is immediately and without investigation thrown out and discounted as "pseudoscience" by these establishment defending pseudosceptics.

The above video is for all pseudosceptics attacking paranormal claims the world over. Something you can finally identify with.

Soak it up sweethearts!

SciForums Thread -

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?p=2642739

Read more...

Just Peer Review It! : And Other Nonsense Comments

Have you seen this type of comment recently regarding Steorn? I've seen it countless times now in the past 3 weeks.

"Until they publish a paper in a peer-reviewed physics journal, I'd suggest ignoring them. A number of crackpots, both self-deluding and scammers, have made claims about perpetual motion machines before, with each claim getting shot down after analysis" 

What this guy and all the other "experts" forget about scientific journals and the system of peer review is that science and more importantly ($$$ scientific funding $$$) is based on reputation.  If you don't play the game and do your scientific work within the boundaries of accepted science then you will NEVER get a peer review.

The guys responsible for peer review and who write these journals won't touch the subject of free energy with a bargepole for fear of being associated with tsc tsc...something so ludicrous.  Heaven forbid they push the frontiers of knowledge by trying to understand something that doesn't fit the accepted view.  No, no - better to keep the status quo than have the funding cut.

So just quit with the "Peer review it!" crap as it is not a viable method for acceptance of free energy.

Read more...